Help

Built with Seam

You can find the full source code for this website in the Seam package in the directory /examples/wiki. It is licensed under the LGPL.

FAQ Category:

No, Seam has something much more powerful: a conversation context. The Seam conversation context is propagated across redirects (even when no long-running conversation is in progress), so you can use the conversation context to store success messages and the like.

Furthermore, Seam manages a page context for each JSF page, which allows you to store objects across JSF POSTbacks without even starting a long-running conversation. This is the ideal context for short-lived AJAX operations, which often need to propagate state through several form submits.

6 comments:
28. Apr 2008, 17:25 America/New_York | Link
shreekanth patil

Hi,

Am a Ruby on Rails developer, i was java developer also... will you please clarify me, want to know what makes java developer to use RoR, or a RoR developer to use jboss Seam ?

please clarify...

Thanks, Shreekanth patil
18. Oct 2008, 15:00 America/New_York | Link
rabi

you can use both its your(developer) choice. ROR is not scalable. For complex apps or enterprise apps use jboss seam with jboss 5.

 
11. Dec 2008, 10:17 America/New_York | Link

After 1 year of develop with Seam I can reply:

Does seam replace the RoR ?

LOL!! :-)

 
03. Feb 2009, 06:39 America/New_York | Link
Ron Ramirez

Seam obviously does not replace RoR b/c you can deploy both Seam and RoR apps on JBoss 5 AS...
 
20. Jun 2009, 10:42 America/New_York | Link
Jens Benecke

The myth that Ruby on Rails does not scale is just that: a myth.

Anybody who claims that this is true has never actually used Rails in any serious context, and probably doesn't know xing.com, twitter.com or yellowpages.com (just to name a few).

There's room for all of us, guys, stop spreading FUD.
 
01. Apr 2010, 23:17 America/New_York | Link
Bj

Funny, after a year or so, I've read ruby DID have scaling issues in most of those companies you listed.